![]() ![]() So my next post on this topic may be delayed by more than a week. deb packages, which will be needed to find out the scope of the problem. Confusion on whose side I do not know.įor the next few days my internet access will be too unreliable and the bandwidth too limited in order to download a larger number of random. deb packages, there might be a confusion about the specification of how. In case the problem should be found in Ubuntu. xz file format is used as an internal part of some other file format or communication protocol, it usually is expected that the decoder. deb packages (not only mdm*.deb), then this might be something to ask the Mint makers about. In case the problem should be limited to Mint. In case the problem should be limited to the mdm*.deb packages, the issue may be ignored, because the software package mdm is a dying species on Mint, because it has been replaced by lightdm on recent Mint versions. packages from the Ubuntu software repos (Mint is based on Ubuntu) and find out whether they cause the same problem. deb packages from the Mint software repos and find out whether they cause the same problem. The common factor of all mdm*.deb files: They all are published only for Linux Mint on the Linux Mint software repository website,. I had given one of the mdm*.deb files as an example, which could be used to reproduce the problem. And thank you very much for taking the time of investigating the issue. So we’ve demonstrated that xz does indeed create much smaller archives than gzip.This is interesting indeed. But at 70 seconds, xz also took nearly 18 times as long! Compression levels six and beyond hugely increased the compression time for a negligible 1% reduction in archive size
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |